I've also removed the reference to ED out of the following: In addition, that source was horribly incorrect. We don't want to list memes here - that's what Wikichan is for. Can you get your men off the Pokémon articles before I feel compelled to DDoS 4chan? (The preceding comment was meant to be sarcastic.) - Jéské ( v^_^v Damn spy sappin' mah sentry!) 00:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)īesides lolcats, memes include the 'FBI party van' for legally questionable content. J Milburn ( talk) 19:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Can I cite this as a typical situation that supports the 'typical view' that Wikipedia admins are power-tripping buzzkills? 98.208.95.209 ( talk) 23:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC) Depends. Whether you agree or not is irrelevent, it isn't going in the article. There are no reliable sources discussing the 'typical view' of 4chan members, so it will not be included. 86.135.126.195 ( talk) 15:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC) This is not a forum for discussion of 4chan, it is for discussing the article. 124.40.47.75 ( talk) 13:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC) Exactly, 4chan users are the kind of people who think Fight Club was a clever film and like to quote from it at random. We are the postman, we are the delivers of your pizza. The group of people who use 4chan are a mix of all different kinds of people, hence one of their many unofficial mottos: These people, who really are losers and (almost always) emo to boot, go to their youtube and rave about how the evil people attacked them, typically, in a fit of hypocrisy, claiming that the channers are, in fact, the emo's and losers, which is false. 4chan is notorius for launching XBOX HUEG raids against furry, emo, goth, anime-fan, and pro-anorexic communities, just to name a few. Pacific Coast Highway 21:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Actually, it isn't. Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.181.241.99 ( talk) 04:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Don't encourage him. contribs) 13:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Do you have any reliable sources? J Milburn ( talk) 18:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Someone needs to make that into a demotivator.That's true right? -Preceding unsigned comment added by Twinscythe ( talk No offence to any frequent 4chan goers but there should be something about how people who go 4chan are typically viewed as losers or emo's. Needs adding in to the article ASAP jump on it! jump on it! -Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.31.109 ( talk) 20:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Someone should add this -Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.72.82.183 ( talk) 23:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC) He certainly mentions 4chan! Any third party sources, or is it just him in his shows (plus blog, whatever)? J Milburn ( talk) 16:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC) There's usually a thread which pops up on /b/ when 4chan feels like messing with Tom Green. Howa0082 ( talk) 16:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Actually, we could possibly have a section on that. contribs) 09:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Do you have any reliable sources? J Milburn ( talk) 16:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC) The only sources for that would be the actual webisodes of his show, which I think are either on his site or YouTube or something.This should be on the page -Preceding unsigned comment added by Tidussquall10x ( talk Why does this page say nothing about how the 4chan mess up Tom Greens show all the time? Certain post numbers, such as 1234562222, and the aforementioned milestones, are sought after, with a large amount of posting taking place to "GET" them." I think this needs to be updated. 69.196.141.174 ( talk) 05:35, (UTC) "After /b/'s 31,000,000th post was made on June 16, 2007, it took just 9 days to accumulate another 1,000,000, meaning /b/'s posting rate had attained an average of more than 111,000 posts per day. it was apparently a "Stop Jew" sign but everybody missed it in the frenzy. Jéské ( v^_^v E pluribus unum) 00:51, (UTC) So, just curious, what was 66000000GET? WinGET or FailGet? - Ghost Stalker ( Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 03:55, (UTC) Fail. Jéské ( v^_^v E pluribus unum) 00:42, (UTC) Further, 404'd links don't help your case. I'm sorry, but this was reverted before because the number of posts a forum has, regardless of its fame, is irrelevant. Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.154.224 ( talk) 23:33, (UTC) Extraneous info is fail. Would anyone with the ability like to update the article please? Screenshots were taken of the post as proof, links are found on this page. Post was made at 19.25.11 according to 4chan's timestamp. 4chan's /b/ has just surpassed 66000000 posts as of Monday, May 5 2008.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |